<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Technology scouting and acquisition: what do YOU want to know?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.parc.com/blog/2009/09/technology-scouting-and-acquistion-what-do-you-want-to-know/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.parc.com/blog/2009/09/technology-scouting-and-acquistion-what-do-you-want-to-know/</link>
	<description>perspectives, trends, discussions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2011 06:03:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer Ernst</title>
		<link>http://blogs.parc.com/blog/2009/09/technology-scouting-and-acquistion-what-do-you-want-to-know/comment-page-1/#comment-715</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer Ernst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 16:31:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.parc.com/?p=1277#comment-715</guid>
		<description>David, this is a great add, and I will raise it with the panel.  It&#039;s exactly the point I made in my post on &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.parc.com/blog/2009/08/opening-communication-for-open-innovation-should-you-share-your-strategy/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Open Communication&lt;/a&gt; last week. 

Another theme that&#039;s coming up in my offline conversations is the importance of a trust-based relationship and the challenges of establishing that trust in the early stages.  These two issues are definitely intertwined and I&#039;ll write more about that soon. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David, this is a great add, and I will raise it with the panel.  It&#8217;s exactly the point I made in my post on <a href="http://blogs.parc.com/blog/2009/08/opening-communication-for-open-innovation-should-you-share-your-strategy/" rel="nofollow">Open Communication</a> last week. </p>
<p>Another theme that&#8217;s coming up in my offline conversations is the importance of a trust-based relationship and the challenges of establishing that trust in the early stages.  These two issues are definitely intertwined and I&#8217;ll write more about that soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://blogs.parc.com/blog/2009/09/technology-scouting-and-acquistion-what-do-you-want-to-know/comment-page-1/#comment-714</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 00:28:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.parc.com/?p=1277#comment-714</guid>
		<description>Thank you for asking Jennifer. We find, as an early-stage company, that most of the conversations are one-way. Even if an NDA is in force.

With a technology that addresses many applications and creates value for multiple operating silos, the one-way discussions are counter-productive. These are with Fortune 500 companies.

Why don&#039;t those Scouts provide more detail regarding product technology road-maps or system platforms? It would enable outside technologists to get very specific and save everyone time would it not? Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for asking Jennifer. We find, as an early-stage company, that most of the conversations are one-way. Even if an NDA is in force.</p>
<p>With a technology that addresses many applications and creates value for multiple operating silos, the one-way discussions are counter-productive. These are with Fortune 500 companies.</p>
<p>Why don&#8217;t those Scouts provide more detail regarding product technology road-maps or system platforms? It would enable outside technologists to get very specific and save everyone time would it not? Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

