15 November 2011 | Editor
Forbes has some interesting commentary on Steve Jobs and whether Malcolm Gladwell (yes, him again) is wrong in calling Steve a “tweaker” and therefore less of a visionary or “true” inventor.
One Forbes article argues that Gladwell gets Jobs wrong because Jobs went beyond tweaking, and no inventor really starts with a clean sheet of paper.
Another Forbes article cautions against viewing Jobs as just a tweaker, that is, don’t assume his “editorial sensibility” implies that innovation should be cheap, easy, incremental, and not involve any serious invention.
Obviously, we believe there’s more to all of this. Given our experiences, here are some of our thoughts –
This is where an approach like ethnography [pdf download] can help: it moves companies from not just “solving the problem right” (e.g., tweaking to a better version of a hot sexy mobile phone), to “solving the right problem” (e.g., launching such a phone with an app ecosystem that fundamentally changes the structure and economics of the industry). By capturing what people actually do, instead of just what they say they do, ethnography uncovers and reveals what people really need or want…even if they don’t know it. And you don’t have to be a visionary with a clean sheet of paper.For us, at the end of the day it’s all about use: by companies, by people, in the world.
[...] Was Steve Jobs an innovator or a tweaker?…The PARC blog says that there is more to the issue than meets the eye. It’s not so much a question of innovating vs. tweaking as it is finding the right problem to solve. A fascinating short read on a complex topic. [...]
augmented reality big data business models cloud computing contextual intelligence DARPA disruptive innovation electric vehicles ethnography future of maufacturing government ideation and beyond information overload intellectual property intelligent automation location-based long tail malware manufacturing MVP (minimum viable product) open innovation PARC Forum portfolio management printed electronics reading list real options recommendation systems social search startups Steve Jobs twitter Wikipedia Xerox
November 16th, 2011 at 9:39am
Posted by Chunka Mui, Forbes contributor
Thanks for jumping in on the Forbes piece. Your third point is especially important, and I’d go further by saying that clean sheets of paper aren’t just for Edison-like (or PARC-like) visionaries.
In fact, you can’t innovate unless you reexamine the problem with a clean sheet of paper. You don’t necessarily end there but you have to examine the problem and potential solutions from that lens.
Regards,
Chunka Mui