9 July 2012 | Stephen Hoover
“Okay, we know open innovation works in practice. So now the question is, does it work in theory?!” Henry Chesbrough opened his remarks with this joke at our recent 10th birthday event. He was joking because PARC has been practicing open innovation since being incorporated as an independent subsidiary in 2002, well before Henry published his seminal book coining and outlining ‘open innovation’.
Since then, open innovation has moved from business phrase and concept to business practice and reality. But what does it mean, really??
Simply put: open innovation means drawing on resources and/or working with people outside one’s organization to fill in gaps and accomplish your goals… whatever they are. Because one of the biggest mistakes (as Henry noted) you can make in today’s innovation landscape is assuming that all the best people in the world work for you. They don’t.
Open innovation is a way to leverage others’ expertise, assets, and resources for your needs, whether you’re buying or selling (or both). There are many ways to do this – think of a spectrum, ranging from unfettered to orchestrated, all of them loosely categorized as “open innovation”:
For PARC it’s not as simple as “open” + “innovation”. It’s about more than the sum of these parts.
To PARC, open innovation goes beyond technology a la carte and research for hire: it’s gaining strategic insight into our clients’ roadmaps and visions and then working together (what we often call “co-developing“) to achieve them.
Sometimes this involves shaping those future directions and outcomes together by applying:
Most companies divide these three circles, functionally and philosophically, which works well to run core operations at scale. And that’s fine, because just one of these is enough to help you with incremental innovation.
But to achieve the type of innovation that has and can transform your business, you need to be at the intersection of all three of these. That’s where the potential for transformation lies – and as we’ve evolved our business model and client engagements over the past 10 years, it’s where we’ve found our “sweet spot” in the evolving innovation landscape.
This was a great read. There’s no need for a majestic elaboration in my comment; I simply agree with the concept in its entirety. I must say the most important notion to grasp is that of “evolving innovation”.
Jimmy
augmented reality big data business models cloud computing contextual intelligence DARPA disruptive innovation electric vehicles ethnography future of maufacturing government ideation and beyond information overload intellectual property intelligent automation location-based long tail malware manufacturing MVP (minimum viable product) open innovation PARC Forum portfolio management printed electronics reading list real options recommendation systems social search startups Steve Jobs twitter Wikipedia Xerox
July 19th, 2012 at 2:55pm
Posted by Andy Zynga, CEO
Stephen,
I think this is a great structure. NineSigma plays in the areas you outlined in the bullet points, except for open source. And we also do end-to-end development with our strategic partner Nottingham Spirk design associates. I like the “human element” because lots of people in open innovation seem to think a “platform” is all you need to be successful…
One observation, though — We tend to think in “three rings”, i.e., (1) internal or collaborative innovation, then (2) ecosystem innovation across the network of trusted partners, and then (3) open innovation with the global innovation community. Interestingly, our clients find that the processes for connecting globally can just as well be used for connecting internally across business units, as well as across the trusted network. The latter is a really low hanging fruit for many businesses. I think that “collaborative innovation” is not quite the same as “open innovation”, but it helps clients get to market faster, so we are very happy to apply all the principles for external innovation to the internal and trusted network piece…
Regards,
Andy